Creative analytics
Creative analytics is the Creatives library read as a set of decisions rather than a gallery. Same ads, same data — but ordered the way a media buyer actually works: what’s the verdict, what do I act on now, what’s decaying, am I testing fast enough, and what kind of creative is winning.
In one line
Pick a metric, read the verdict, work the “Act now” lists, then look at the breakdown to decide what to make next.
Pick one metric first#
Everything on the page is ranked by a single metric you choose at the top: ROAS, CPA, CTR, CPM, CPC, or Conversions. ROAS is the default and the right starting point for most ecommerce accounts; switch to CPA when revenue isn’t tracked, or CTR when you’re judging creative appeal rather than the funnel behind it.
Changing the metric re-sorts the whole board. That’s deliberate — the ad that’s best on CTR is often not the one that’s best on ROAS, and seeing that flip is itself the insight.
Narrowing the view#
The toolbar scopes what’s included:
- Platform — one network or several.
- Lifecycle — active, paused, retired, draft, or archived. Starts on active.
- Angle — the creative promises found in your account, drawn from your own tagged creatives rather than a fixed list.
- Period — the date window the analytics are measured over.
Partial periods are flagged
If synced creative performance only covers part of the period you selected, the page says so under the period control. The numbers aren’t wrong — they just cover less than you asked for.
Reading the board#
Verdict#
The headline: how the account did over the period on your chosen metric, the trend against the prior period, and how much spend was wasted.
Act now#
The short list, split two ways:
- Cut or fix — creatives spending real money without earning it back.
- Scale — creatives outperforming the account and worth more budget.
This is the section to work first. Select a row to locate it on the chart, or click through to the creative itself.
Fatigue#
Creatives whose click rate is sliding week over week while cost per conversion climbs — the classic fingerprint of an ad that’s worn out its welcome. A winner in fatigue is a replacement you need to brief now, not after it stops working.
Velocity#
How fast new creatives are entering the account. Low velocity is the quiet killer: an account that stops launching new creative stops learning, and its performance decays on a lag you won’t see for weeks.
What’s winning#
The breakdown, across four lenses:
| Lens | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Angles | Creative promises, ranked by performance |
| Hooks | Opening devices, ranked by performance |
| Formats | Performance compared with how spend is allocated |
| Platforms | Channel performance compared with spend allocation |
Angles and hooks are ranked because you want the winner. Formats and platforms are shown against spend allocation because the interesting finding there is a mismatch — the format that performs best getting the smallest share of budget is a decision waiting to be made.
Mix#
How your spend is distributed across the library, so you can see concentration risk: an account where three creatives carry 80% of spend is one fatigue event away from a bad month.
Common flows#
- Monday triage. ROAS, last 7 days, active only. Work Cut-or-fix, then Scale, then check Fatigue for what to brief.
- Decide what to make next. Switch to the Angles breakdown, find the promise that wins, then check whether you’re actually spending behind it.
- Catch a stall. If Velocity has flattened, the fix isn’t optimisation — it’s new creative.
- Fix a spend mismatch. Formats view: if video outperforms image but takes a third of the budget, that’s your next reallocation.
The gallery behind these numbers — open any ad to see its history.
Swipe fileReferences for the angle you just found under-served.
Ask Adlyse AIIt can look at the creative itself, not just the metrics.
ExplorerWhen the problem turns out to be structure, not creative.
Pull the same rollups — angles, fatigue, launch velocity — with get_creative_insights.